A dangerous thing to do sometimes. Today I was thinking about books I’ve read that have influenced me to where I am today.
Now, I’m a voracious reader, averaging a book a day since I was about 5 years old. Yes there have been days when I didn’t read – rare, but they happened. then again, there have been days when I’ve read 2-3 books at a sitting. As a child read children’s books, but was still in single digits when I began reading books about archeology, particularly the Aztec, Mayan, Olmecs. Yes, Egypt. Got into Arthurian fiction. Also biographies; there are a lot of biographies aimed at younger readers!! Science fiction was a long time favorite – and then there is Bradbury.
And Bradbury brought me around to the difference between Dystopian fiction and Apocalyptic fiction. Had long thought that Earth Abides was the book that got me thinking about survival – as an individual and as a society. I read that sometime in my early teens, between 13 and 16.
But what about Fahrenheit 451? A society that was presented strictly through the aspect of reading and books, but is to my older eyes, socialist. a Nanny State. Where people had their lives dictated. While Fahrenheit 451 did not go to the before or after, what was the general decline of freedom that lead to a society that was so easily controlled? and where would that society go when productivity of the populace declined to where it could not support the populace? Because you know that will happen!
1984 is the big book that most of us think as the mark of our changing society. Some toss in Brave New World. Both read when I was in my later teens. Fahrenheit 451 when I was probably still a single digit age or just about, Earth Abides a few years later. Then Brave New World. Then 1984. Then Animal Farm. Later still, Atlas Shrugged. Atlas Shrugged seems to be about where we are now, but instead of the quiet revolution of John Galt, will we have something more violent as it all falls apart and people begin to riot and destroy as their lives fall apart, food becomes even more difficult to find. Ayn Rand didn’t see that. Then again, Atlas Shrugged never really goes that extra step, does it?
Now we have TONS of Apocalyptic fiction to choose from – EMP’s, Plagues, General government take overs. The last I read was about Civil Forfeiture; someone who just said no and fought back creating a revolution. A couple I read seemed to have no beginning or end, just basically government overreach pushing everything to a breaking point, but never the other side being represented as to what they were looking to accomplish – just the POV of the people trying to survive, usually in violent gun battles. Like video games and the most popular movies, lots of explosions, noise, flames, etc. No point, just a lot of BANG!!
One had an excellent idea, just start pushing elected officials to start answering the question, How are you going to keep to your oath of office? Or, Why are you breaking your Oath of Office. how do you justify that LIE?!
And that all leads to another thought. It was very much a thing of those rebellious years of the mid-60’s to -70’s to read these books. Yes I read Marx. and it was pretty obvious THAT was a plan that was not going to work!!
Never read Mein Kempf nor Mao’s little red book, although I know some did.
Were we programming ourselves? Did reading those books make what is happening now to be more obvious as to their end result? It doesn’t seem so. Despite so many making reference to our society becoming more 1984ish, a lot of people don’t seem to care. In reference to the Oath of Office question, something I’ve asked frequently, people seem willing to give up their freedom readily. They don’t want the responsibility that freedom brings. They’d rather be safe. Take what is happening in Arizona right now; a rancher in southern Arizona is being tried for murder. He went out of his house, armed, seeing armed men crossing his property – AGAIN! an “undocumented” – gotta be PC here – alien was shot and killed. His gun DOES NOT match the bullet. No eye witnesses. But he’s on trial for murder. The government is not keeping him and his family safe. They would rather take his gun. They would rather this man and his family cower in their homes in fear while armed criminals – and they are doing a whole bunch of illegal activities like human trafficking – cut through his property. and if they should decide to enter his home? They should die, cowering in their bathroom????? You speak to an Anti Gun person about this and the reaction in their brain is something like Johnny 5 or Robbie the Robot going through a “that does not compute” breakdown. They will stay with the Anti Gun stance and just say things like That would never happen, or they should move. Isn’t that simple. A couple of 70 year olds, who will not be able to sell their property, should just give up their family home of decades, their life style, and MOVE! With what money and where would they go?
Am not interested in seeing blood in the streets, some of which might end up being mine, no thank you!! But kind of think the Oath of Office idea has merit. Would really like to see our elected officials keeping their Oath of Office and thinking about the people of this country rather than enriching themselves. But getting rich and scheming and scamming seem to be the order of the day. See Wayne LaPierre!
Have no answers, just more thinking going on . . .